FAQ
What is in the collection now?
The collection covers three Board meetings (September 22, October 6, and October 20, 2026), two source-linked reports, a September 22 searchable video transcript, and curated October caption excerpts stored on Cloudflare R2.
Did supervisors vote to agendize PG&E while refusing a vote on the moratorium?
No. On October 20, a resident requested a future moratorium agenda item and no motion or vote followed. Supervisors then discussed a PG&E shutoff and whether that issue should be on a future agenda, but there was no documented motion or vote to schedule PG&E either. The difference documented in the transcript is the amount and nature of Board discussion, not competing agendizing vote results. Review timestamps and sources.
Is the project 41 MW or 16 MW?
Multiple speakers discussed a 41 MW figure. At the September 22 meeting, New York GreenCloud founder/CEO Joe Church said 41 MW reflected an earlier range of possibilities and that the company currently plans to seek approval for a 16 MW data center. Until a formal application is published, the archive labels 16 MW as the developer's current stated plan rather than as a final permitted project size.
Did the Board approve or reject the data center on September 22?
No. The discussion occurred during Public Matters Not on the Agenda. The chair stated that no action would be taken during that portion of the meeting, and the data-center discussion ended without a Board vote on the project or on a moratorium.
Did the Board adopt a moratorium?
No moratorium action is documented in the three supplied meeting records through October 20, 2026. On October 20, speakers repeatedly requested a future agenda discussion, but the transcript contains no Board motion or vote to schedule such a discussion. Later actions must be checked separately.
Are the technical claims in public comments treated as verified facts?
No. Claims about water use, jobs, tax revenue, fire risk, tribal jurisdiction, noise, air emissions, power supply, or other impacts are attributed to the people who made them unless the archive has a source document that independently supports the claim.
Why are there spelling errors in the transcript?
The transcripts are derived from machine-generated YouTube captions; the September 22 source has a searchable working transcript and the October source files contain selected time ranges. Speaker names, technical terms and exact quotations must be checked against original video and primary documents.