CollectionFlock Surveillance Collection

Archive guide

Flock Surveillance Collection FAQ

Plain-language answers tied to the currently published Flock Safety records, with conflicts and missing information left visible.

What is Flock Safety, and what is an ALPR?

Flock Safety is the vendor named in the released Amador County records. An automated license plate reader, or ALPR, captures images associated with passing vehicles and uses software to read license plates for later searching and alerts.

What records are included in this archive?

The archive currently includes public-records requests, agency responses, the Flock contract, Policy 473, Board material, training and access emails, data-sharing records, camera-location disclosures, usage exports, hotlist data, and an administrative event log.

How many camera locations are documented?

The Sheriff’s Office’s earlier written response identifies eight camera units across five general location groups. A later July 27, 2026 Flock email says two additional locations were still left to install, bringing the documented project context to ten locations while leaving the two remaining sites unidentified. The Camera Map page separates the eight disclosed locations from those two open locations.

How long is Flock data retained?

The published records do not provide one consistent answer. The agency response and contract describe a 30-day default, while Policy 473 contains language saying ALPR data downloaded to the server should be retained for at least one year. The archive treats that difference as unresolved.

Who can access or receive Amador County Flock data?

The agency response describes access by California law-enforcement agencies using Flock for Search and Alert functions and says data is not shared with certain federal, out-of-state, immigration-enforcement, or private recipients. Separate records also show network-sharing activity involving outside organizations. The exact current access list remains an open records question.

Is reasonable suspicion required before a historical search?

Policy 473 says reasonable suspicion or probable cause is not required before using an ALPR. The same policy limits access to official law-enforcement purposes and requires approved training.

Does a Flock alert prove that a crime occurred?

No. An alert is a system match, not proof of criminal conduct. The released policy says deputies should verify an ALPR response through CLETS when practicable before taking enforcement action based solely on an alert.

What is the difference between the event and audit logs?

The archive uses event logs for operational activity such as searches, hits, and user lookups, while audit logs record administrative or configuration activity such as accounts, roles, hotlists, network sharing, exports, and settings. The Flock Event & Audit Logs page groups both record types while keeping the distinction clear.

Will new event logs be added?

The event-log report is designed to accept later monthly releases. New source logs can be preserved as separate dated files while the explanatory tables and cumulative summaries are updated.

Where can I see the unresolved questions?

Each report includes open questions and source links. The largest current issues include retention, historic approval and procurement records, the current network-sharing configuration, and whether a complete plate-search audit log will be released.